![]() |
|
| Fourteen-year old Pakistani Christian escapes death penalty on appeal: A chronology |
|
| Illiterate youth convicted, acquitted of writing blasphemous grafitti | |
On May 11, 1993, the imam of the mosque at Ratta Dhotran, district Gujranwala, Punjab, Pakistan alleged at the Kot Ladha police station that some persons had written derogatory remarks about the Prophet Muhammad on the walls of the mosque and had thrown slips of paper with similar language written on them into the mosque. Three Christians, Rehmat Masih, Manzoor Masih and a minor boy Salamat Masih were alleged to have been been seen writing the blasphemous material on the mosque wall. Manzoor Masih and Salamat Masih is reported to be illiterate. According to a story in the Los Angeles Times, Salamat Masih reported that the affair started with a quarrel over some pigeons. He told the (non-governmental) Human Rights Commission of Pakistan that he had been beaten to make him implicate the other accused. On February 9, 1995 Salamat Masih and Rehmat Masih were sentenced to death. Manzoor Masih had been murdered in an attack in April 1994 that injured the other defendants and John joseph, a Christian human rights activist. Background In 1986, the Pakistan Penal code was amended by adding section 295-C. This provided for life imprisonment or the death penalty for the offence of defiling the name of the Prophet Muhammad. 295-C Use of deragatory remarks, etc. in respect of the Holy Prophet: Whoever by words, either spoken or written, or by visible representations, or by any imputation, innuendo, or insinuation, directly or indirectly, defiles the sacred name of the Holy Prophet (peace be on him), shall be punished with death, or imprisonment for life, and shall also be liable to fine. Previously, under Sections 295-298 PPC (dating from the period of the British Raj) attacks on places of worhip, insulting religious beliefs, disturbing a religious assembly, trespassing on burial grounds, and wounding religious feelings were forbidden. The action had to be intentional to be punished and all religious groups were covered by the legislation. The maximum prison sentence was two years. Ruling on a private petition in October 1990 the Federal Shariat Court ruled that Islam provides only the death penalty for this offence. The Court required the government to remove the alternative of life imprisonement by April 30, 1991, failing which the the provision for life imprisonment would be deemed to have been struck. The rulings of the Federal Shariat Court are binding on the government under Article 203-D(3) of the Constitution. The government neither ammended the law, nor appealed the judgement to the Shariah Appelate Court in the time allowed by the judgement. Thus, as of May 1, 1991 death is the only penalty for someone found guilty under Section 295-C PPC. While the provision for life imprisonment remains on the books, it is without legal effect. Amnesty International reports that charges of blasphemy seem to be brought arbitrarily and are usually motivated be religious intolerance of the accused's beliefs or professional and economic rivalry. A former Judge of the Supreme Court, Dorab Patel, has criticised the law as being vague and unjust in that neither is 'defilement' defined, nor is intention taken into account. In February 1994, the Pakistan Law Commission meeting under the chairmanship of the Chief Justice of Pakistan, Justice Dr. Naseem Hasan Shah, expressed grave concern over the abuse of the blapshemy law. The Case So Far On November 8, 1993, Salamat Masih (not the other two defendants) was granted bail of 50,000 rupees. On 15 November, 1993 the thirteen year old Salamat Masih was released on bail by the Gujranwala sessions court after five and a half months in jail over the objections of the mullahs who had held a daily rally in front of the court. On 12 January 1994, the other accused were granted bail. All of the accused went into hiding after being released. The case was transferred from Gujranwala to Lahore on the grounds that the safety of the accused could not be guaranteed in Gujranwala. The Lahore High Court granted police protection to the accused between the court and defense lawyer's office. On 5 April 1994, a hearing of the case was held in the District and Sessions Court, Lahore. After the court session the defendants and an escort were attacked. Manzoor Masih was shot dead. The others, including Salamat Masih were seriously injured. Amnesty International reports that the Foreign Minister of Pakistan issued a statement blaming the attack on foreign agents. The 20 or so Christian families of Ratta Dhotran have decided to leave the village. On 9 February 1995, the defendants were sentenced to death by a court in Lahore. On 22 February 1995, the Lahore High Court acquitted the accused on appeal. During the appeal hearings demonstrators demanded the death of the accused and even of the defence counsel. Sources:
- News From Asia Watch, 19 September 1993
- Persecuted By Law, I.A. Rehamn, NEWSLINE, Karachi, November December 1993
- Victims of Zealotry, Nafisa Shah, NEWSLINE, Karachi, November December 1993
- Country Reports on Human rights Practices for 1993, US Department of State February 1993
- PAKISTAN Use and abuse of the blasphemy laws Amnesty International July 1994 AI Index: ASA 33/08/94 Distr: CO/SC
- Los Angeles Times, 23 March 1994
- Amnesty International documents UA 137/94 ASA 33/02/94 ASA 33/06/94
Return to Project Open Book